
Writing has been elusive as ever. Sometimes in the midst of creating poems or short story-ish things I just want to indulge in scenes I've just experienced with my family. But I'm not David Sedaris, or anything close, so this gets me nowhere in any career venue.
Still I think it's best to trust the source and not fight against it. Let it come and then move on to something else, rejuvenated.
On TV while I was sitting with my family in the hotel in Ohio, there was a study being reported in the news. The study showed that women are less happy than they were 30 years ago. They supposedly measured across a wide range of women and men of different backgrounds, careers, age, etc. Everything came out to women being less happy than they were 30 years ago, and less happy than men period. Men's happiness, according to the study, had stayed the same over the same time period.
I always wonder who participates in these studies. No one polled me. No one asked anyone I know. How was "happiness" measured? Couldn't it have been that men were more likely to report being happy on these questionnaires? Or that women are always more prone to questioning their happiness (could I get more out of life?) than men.

MJ found a ring while we were out shopping. The ring made her very happy, as she rarely finds a ring that thrills her, and even more rarely spends this kind of money on herself. She named the ring Quantum.
My uncle didn't find what he was looking for in Ohio.

Though he is one of the most accomplished people I know, a person who delights in many different intellectual pursuits, I almost never look at him and think he is a person who is happy, except fleetingly.
In my experience happiness is a temporary state, yet it's held as an ideal that everyone should desire to achieve on a consistent basis. Satisfaction and happiness are not necessarily the same (I would bet that this study delineates between the two).
It's true that writing makes me happy sometimes, but that I spend most of my life unhappy because I am not writing enough, or well. I spend more time being unhappy that I am not writing more, than I do being happy in what I write. I take less time to write than I take to do anything else, yet place upon it the most importance. This all seems like some kind of rat-in-a-maze game I play with myself, with no results whatsoever except to make me an grumpy, distracted person to be around.
MJ said on this trip that we need to use the Ohio gathering as a springboard from which to make a quantum leap. So when I got back last night, I had a small inspiration for what to do on the nights when I only have an hour or hour-point-five to spend on something creative.
In my house are several hearths: the writing table, the sewing machine, the bass, and whatever other projects I've got going on (currently Jake's photo book). When I've only got a little bit of time and I've spent the day sitting so much at work, I often don't want to spend my only extra hour before bed at a table, sitting and hunching over some other work. But last night I had the idea to set the timer and do a little bit of everything for 15 minutes.
So, as i sit here bundled up in the Caroline quilt trying to save oil, I am warmed by this idea of small fires. A small one is better than a big one, and will be there the next time you get more than an hour to spend on something.
I think I am on my way to making a leap.